Difference between revisions of "User talk:ZoeRobinson"
From CPCWiki - THE Amstrad CPC encyclopedia!
ZoeRobinson (Talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::Thanks for the new versions, they look much better. Which emulator is this BTW? I tend to use JavaCPC for screenshots and so far I've not encountered any unintended scanlines... --[[User:Morn|Morn]] ([[User talk:Morn|talk]]) 19:51, 23 October 2013 (EEST) | ::Thanks for the new versions, they look much better. Which emulator is this BTW? I tend to use JavaCPC for screenshots and so far I've not encountered any unintended scanlines... --[[User:Morn|Morn]] ([[User talk:Morn|talk]]) 19:51, 23 October 2013 (EEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::It's MacCpc, which is pretty good for bashing out type-ins because it's fast and lightweight. It's not so good for making sure they work, however - it doesn't handle RSXes well, plus a few other issues cropped up while I was working on Issue 25; hence that's not going to be a 100% tested update. :( --[[User:ZoeRobinson|ZoeRobinson]] ([[User talk:ZoeRobinson|talk]]) 20:53, 23 October 2013 (EEST) | ||
Revision as of 13:53, 23 October 2013
Hi Zoe!
Welcome to CPC-Wiki! Could you reupload the screenshots at Amstrad Action September 1987 Type-Ins without the scanline effect? Those scanlines make the image thumbnails extremely dark and hard to decipher.
Thanks! --Morn (talk) 13:47, 23 October 2013 (EEST)
- The scanlines came up when I took the screenshot. I'll see if I can deinterlace them but I can't guarantee anything. --ZoeRobinson (talk) 14:06, 23 October 2013 (EEST)
- It's MacCpc, which is pretty good for bashing out type-ins because it's fast and lightweight. It's not so good for making sure they work, however - it doesn't handle RSXes well, plus a few other issues cropped up while I was working on Issue 25; hence that's not going to be a 100% tested update. :( --ZoeRobinson (talk) 20:53, 23 October 2013 (EEST)
