Difference between revisions of "Talk:Applications"
From CPCWiki - THE Amstrad CPC encyclopedia!
m |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
As a programming language or a DOS is not really an "application". As we have the CPCWiki portal now, it wouldn't make any confusions I think. What do you think? -- [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 17:51, 1 September 2006 (CEST) | As a programming language or a DOS is not really an "application". As we have the CPCWiki portal now, it wouldn't make any confusions I think. What do you think? -- [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 17:51, 1 September 2006 (CEST) | ||
:I think that this is a good idea. Another pro is that the article isn't overloaded any longer. --[[User:Octoate|Octoate]] 20:38, 1 September 2006 (CEST) | :I think that this is a good idea. Another pro is that the article isn't overloaded any longer. --[[User:Octoate|Octoate]] 20:38, 1 September 2006 (CEST) | ||
| + | :I concur. Nevertheless, though I see the distinction between Applications and System Software (such an OS), isn't Programming Software a division of Applications? Isn't a compiler an application itself, for intance? [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 20:41, 1 September 2006 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 14:41, 1 September 2006
I would like to split up this article into three:
- Applications
- Programming software
- System software
As a programming language or a DOS is not really an "application". As we have the CPCWiki portal now, it wouldn't make any confusions I think. What do you think? -- Prodatron 17:51, 1 September 2006 (CEST)
- I think that this is a good idea. Another pro is that the article isn't overloaded any longer. --Octoate 20:38, 1 September 2006 (CEST)
- I concur. Nevertheless, though I see the distinction between Applications and System Software (such an OS), isn't Programming Software a division of Applications? Isn't a compiler an application itself, for intance? Gryzor 20:41, 1 September 2006 (CEST)
